So I'm looking over the news at the multiple Harry Potter sites I go to daily and find myself upon a headline 'JK Rowling sues eBay'. You know what I say to that? Good for her, good for her! There are not that many people willing to stand up to something as big and diverted as eBay, not even the people who are scammed daily and have their credit cards stolen from them. I wish she could do the same with the Peer-to-Peer sharing sites, but alas, that won't be happening – unless she actually does take the time and look at the e-books that are being shared between fans on programs such as LimeWire, along with the audio files from the CDs that go from around $50 at retail price.
But what I'm really trying to get to is this, e-books, I'm pro for allowing them to be sold via the internet, but only on one circumstances. What if these files had a Digital Rights Management (DRM) on them? What if we created a special program that would allow them to be able to read these files, meaning that they would not be in the standard PDF format, without having access to functions such as copy and paste? I mean, isn't it considered plagiarism to just copy-and-paste a document into your own work? Isn't it stated that 'text in this book should not be reproduced in any shape or form'? This proves my statement; e-books should not have the ability to be copied onto a document, so why isn't a DRM reasonable?
Sure, there's an ongoing frustration on freedom of the consumer, but the customer isn't always right and people have to understand that or else it'll become something of the nature of "I want this CD for free, so I'm going to have it for free because I said so!" I'm not trying to say that what Steve Jobs is on about is bad, it's just it isn't financially correct to go towards what he wants to get to. The tags included on music files from the iTunes store are what keep me from begging my friends across the pond to send me a track that's not available on the US version of the store.
Yes, sometimes I do occasionally pirate a few files because of the difficulty of importing (which is why I'm trying to set up an import store to stop me, along with others, from continuing to lose these great artists their well deserved money) because of the fact that just one CD equals around $20 shipping-and-handling along with the price conversion. However, I will say that when a CD finally releases over here, I quickly go and split my copies and throw them in the trash, along with the files themselves.
Which is one thing I hope many consider doing: if you enjoy an album that much that you want a real copy, go and buy the actual CD with its original packaging. Trust me, they may be the highest quality online, but NOTHING compares to an official label produced CD. Not even your iPod Video or Nano can play it that good. And if you don't believe me, test it. IPods aren't the replacement for CDs, they weren't ever advertised for that, they were meant for people who don't want to carry around their CDs around the town. It's like the mobile phone, it wasn't made to replace your house phone, but instead make communication more remote.
But what I'm really trying to get to is this, e-books, I'm pro for allowing them to be sold via the internet, but only on one circumstances. What if these files had a Digital Rights Management (DRM) on them? What if we created a special program that would allow them to be able to read these files, meaning that they would not be in the standard PDF format, without having access to functions such as copy and paste? I mean, isn't it considered plagiarism to just copy-and-paste a document into your own work? Isn't it stated that 'text in this book should not be reproduced in any shape or form'? This proves my statement; e-books should not have the ability to be copied onto a document, so why isn't a DRM reasonable?
Sure, there's an ongoing frustration on freedom of the consumer, but the customer isn't always right and people have to understand that or else it'll become something of the nature of "I want this CD for free, so I'm going to have it for free because I said so!" I'm not trying to say that what Steve Jobs is on about is bad, it's just it isn't financially correct to go towards what he wants to get to. The tags included on music files from the iTunes store are what keep me from begging my friends across the pond to send me a track that's not available on the US version of the store.
Yes, sometimes I do occasionally pirate a few files because of the difficulty of importing (which is why I'm trying to set up an import store to stop me, along with others, from continuing to lose these great artists their well deserved money) because of the fact that just one CD equals around $20 shipping-and-handling along with the price conversion. However, I will say that when a CD finally releases over here, I quickly go and split my copies and throw them in the trash, along with the files themselves.
Which is one thing I hope many consider doing: if you enjoy an album that much that you want a real copy, go and buy the actual CD with its original packaging. Trust me, they may be the highest quality online, but NOTHING compares to an official label produced CD. Not even your iPod Video or Nano can play it that good. And if you don't believe me, test it. IPods aren't the replacement for CDs, they weren't ever advertised for that, they were meant for people who don't want to carry around their CDs around the town. It's like the mobile phone, it wasn't made to replace your house phone, but instead make communication more remote.
Current Location: Sitting on the couch
Current Mood:
tired
tired9 comments | Leave a comment


amused
sore
pissed off
blah